Every leading AI model in one interface. Secure, with no vendor lock-in.
Shadow IT
40% of employees already use unauthorised, uncontrolled tools. Data leaves the company before you notice.
Every leading AI model in one interface. Secure, with no vendor lock-in.
Ready-made skills for recurring tasks – usable right away, by the whole team.
Scheduled tasks that start by themselves: at a fixed time or as soon as something happens, say an invoice arrives in the inbox.
The Meetings app takes notes – on site, online or hybrid – and turns the conversation into finished minutes.
Microsoft 365, Confluence, Jira and more: the HUB works where your data already lives.
Reasoning · code · vision · multimodal
GPT-6 Astra · GPT-6.1 Sol · GPT-6 Luna
Google
Multimodal · long context · vision · code
Gemini 3.1 Pro · Gemini 3.8 Flash · Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Safety-first · long context · EU hosting · GDPR
Fable 5.1 · Opus 5.5 · Sonnet 5.5 · Haiku 4.5
Meta
Open source · on-premise · fine-tuning
Llama 4 Maverick · Llama 4 Scout
European · GDPR-native · EU hosting
Mistral Large 3 · Mistral Medium 3.5 · Mistral Small 4
Privatemode
Confidential computing · end-to-end encrypted · EU hosting
Open frontier models, processed encrypted
“Read Lena Vogt’s enquiry in Outlook, take our 2026 price list from SharePoint and save a quote as a draft reply in Outlook.”
Workflow · Outlook and SharePoint Real output
The draft quote is ready and saved as a reply in the Drafts folder.
Summary:
| Subject | RE: Umbauanfrage |
|---|---|
| To | Lena Vogt (sender address of the enquiry) |
| Status | Draft (not sent) |
Quote contents (prices from the 2026 price list in SharePoint):
| Item | Article | Qty | Net price € |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KA-400 door drive | 4 pcs | 1,890.00 |
| 2 | Installation/commissioning | 4 doors | 420.00 |
| 3 | Call-out flat rate | 1 flat | 95.00 |
| Subtotal | 9,335.00 | ||
| 4 (optional) | Maintenance contract, 24 months | 4 doors | 520.00 |
| Total incl. maintenance | 11,415.00 |
Delivery 4 weeks from order confirmation, payment terms 30 days net, note on availability for the requested week 46. Written in Kranich’s house style.
The draft is in Outlook, ready to review and send: Open draft
Shall I send it now, or would you like to change anything?
“Summarise the call with Muster Logistik for the CRM: need, who decides, concerns, next steps.” Transkript_Muster-Logistik.docx
File · Transcript Real output
Here is the summary of the call for the CRM:
Participants: Thomas Brandt (Kranich, sales) · Katrin Albers (Muster Logistik, head of facility management) · Daniel Roth (Muster Logistik, engineering, Bremen site)
Need
Who decides
Concerns
Next steps
Shall I save this as a document in your workspace?
“I’m visiting Muster Logistik in Bremen on 14 Oct to see the site. Read everything in the SharePoint folder Vertrieb/Kunden/Muster Logistik and give me a one-page briefing: what they need, what I have to check on site, where the risks are.”
Connector · SharePoint Real output
Saved. The two most important points for the visit:
Hall 3 is also currently not connected to the loading-bay control, which the customer explicitly wants – this needs to be clarified on site, including whether it becomes part of the quote.
Briefing Muster Logistik – site visit 14 OctDocument
12 sites in northern Germany, ~140 sectional doors at loading bays, drives partly 20 years old. Modernisation is to happen step by step: Bremen + Hamburg (38 doors) as the starter package, the rest spread over 2027. The customer is getting a competing offer in parallel (cheaper, but installation only from April – our time advantage: start in February).
Excerpt. The briefing continues with risks and dates.
“Create a header image for a LinkedIn post about our KA-400 gate drive: a modern industrial door on a logistics hall in evening light, no text in the image, landscape.” Skill: Image Generation
Skill · Image Generation Real output
The cover image is ready: a modern industrial door on a logistics hall, evening light, calm blue tones with a warm accent light, 16:9 landscape, no text. The image is in the artefacts panel to view and download.
If needed, I can create variants or make adjustments (e.g. a different light colour, building type or crop).
LinkedIn cover image KA-400Image
“Build me an interactive dashboard from the spreadsheet: plan and actual per channel and month, plus cost per lead. Decide the design yourself, without asking back.” Marketing-Budget_2026.xlsx
Skill · Artifact Design Real output
Marketing budget 2026 dashboardHTML
“Turn the trade fair notes into a presentation for the sales team.” Trade_fair_notes.docx
Workspaces · PowerPoint Real output
The presentation is saved in your personal workspace.
“Sales debrief: Messe Tor & Logistik 2026” — 8 slides, built from your stand notes.
Sales debrief: Messe Tor & Logistik 2026Presentation · 8 slides
Sales debrief
Trade fair “Tor & Logistik 2026”
Dortmund, 22–24 September 2026
Stand team: Miriam Koch · Thomas Brandt · Elif Yilmaz · Engineering: Stefan Wolff
Summary of the stand notes for sales
Overview
Key figures at a glance
445conversations at the stand(3 days)
64scanned leadsin total
~60listeners at Stefan’s talk
14%lead rate(leads / conversations)
By fair day
14018Day 121029Day 29517Day 3
ConversationsLeads
Overview
Leads by industry
Customer feedback
Top topics & customer questions at the stand
Market & organisation
Competition and stand feedback
Competition: Muster Torsysteme
Stand feedback
Prioritisation
Hot leads – follow up now
Next steps
To-dos after the fair
| Task | Due |
|---|---|
| Follow up leadsContact all 64 leads, prioritising the 4 hot leads. | by the end of week 41 (Fri, 9 Oct 2026) |
| Have retrofit flyers printedThe most frequent question of the fair – provide material for sales. | soon |
| Prepare the fire station referenceFor approaching the public sector / municipalities (emergency release). | soon |
| Extend the trade fair price?Open decision whether the trade fair terms apply until 31 Oct 2026 – check with sales management. | Decision by 31 Oct 2026 |
Thanks to the stand team.
Questions about leads or content: Miriam Koch, Thomas Brandt, Elif Yilmaz · Engineering: Stefan Wolff
One note: for the delivery time question and the “end of week 41” deadline, I used the practical working day (Friday) as the date — I can change that if needed.
“How many days of working from home are allowed here? Check the 2026 staff handbook and name the source.”
Skill · Workspaces Real output
Up to 3 days of working from home per week, by agreement within the team; Monday is an in-office day for everyone.
Source: document “Mitarbeiterhandbuch 2026”.
“Working student, data analytics, Hamburg, 20 hours a week, starting in January. No company name; the contact is the recruiting team.” Skill: Job ad
Skill · Job ad Real output
About us
We develop software and increasingly use artificial intelligence to make development processes smarter. With us, you work in a small, close-knit team with short decision paths.
What you’ll do
What you bring
What we offer
How to apply
Interested? Send your application to our recruiting team – we look forward to hearing from you. The start date is in January.
“Turn these notes into a detailed German employment reference, overall grade very good.” Stichpunkte_Arbeitszeugnis_Peters.docx
File · Notes Real output
The employment reference for Jana Peters has been saved in the folder “Kranich Antriebstechnik”.
Employment reference Jana PetersDocument
Kranich Antriebstechnik GmbH · Bremen
Ms Jana Peters, born on 14 March 1994, was employed by our company from 1 April 2021 to 31 December 2026, most recently as team coordinator for order processing.
Kranich Antriebstechnik GmbH develops and sells door drives and related spare parts to specialist dealers.
Ms Peters joined our company on 1 April 2021 as an order processing clerk. On 1 January 2024 she took over the position of team coordinator for order processing, with responsibility for three employees.
Her most recent duties included:
Ms Peters grasps new matters very quickly and always got to grips with new tasks and systems swiftly and confidently. She worked in a consistently very structured and goal-oriented way; even at seasonal peaks she always kept the overview and set priorities with great foresight. Thanks to her commitment, she reduced the lead time from order receipt to order confirmation from three to two working days.
As a key user, she mastered the new ERP module comprehensively in a very short time and passed on her knowledge in training 25 colleagues with great teaching skill.
In her role as team coordinator, Ms Peters always led her team in a motivating and fair way. Thanks to her appreciative and at the same time clear leadership, there has been no staff turnover in the team since 2024. She also deputised for the head of inside sales with confidence and a great sense of responsibility.
Ms Peters completed all tasks assigned to her always to our fullest satisfaction.
Her conduct towards superiors, colleagues and customers was always exemplary. Our specialist dealers greatly valued her as a competent and reliable contact.
Ms Peters is leaving our company at her own request on 31 December 2026 to pursue a new career direction. We very much regret her departure, thank her for the consistently very good cooperation and wish her all the best and continued success in her future career and private life.
Bremen, 31 December 2026
Kranich Antriebstechnik GmbH
Dr Henrik Sander
Managing Director
“Jonas from sales sent me this screenshot. What’s the problem, and what should he do now?” Fehlermeldung_VPN.png
File · Screenshot Real output
Problem: The password of the user KRANICH\j.meier expired on 7 Oct 2026. That is why the VPN sign-in fails (error code 0x80070532). The tool requires a password change before it can connect – at the same time, the dialog says the password can only be changed on the company network. A classic deadlock: no password change without VPN, no VPN without a password change.
What Jonas should do now:
Shall I write this up as short instructions for Jonas that you can forward to him?
“A new colleague starts in sales on 1 November. What does IT need to do, and by when?” IT-Onboarding-Checkliste.docx
File · IT checklist Real output
Basis: IT checklist: new employees (uploaded). The first working day is Monday, 2 Nov 2026 (1 Nov is a Sunday), the deadlines are calculated from that.
Tasks relevant for the sales position (owner: IT service):
| Task | Lead time | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Create user account in AD (group GRP_Vertrieb) | 5 WD before | Mon, 26 Oct 2026 |
| Microsoft 365 licence (E3), mailbox, Teams access + department team | 5 WD before | Mon, 26 Oct 2026 |
| Reserve & set up laptop (image, BitLocker) | 3 WD before | Wed, 28 Oct 2026 |
| CRM access with the “sales” role + work phone with Intune profile | 3 WD before | Wed, 28 Oct 2026 |
| VPN access (GlobalProtect), if mobile working is planned | 3 WD before | Wed, 28 Oct 2026 |
| Device handover + 30 min IT security briefing | on day 1 | Mon, 2 Nov 2026 |
Not an IT task, but relevant: the access card is requested via reception, also 5 working days before, so by Mon, 26 Oct 2026.
Not applicable: CAD licence (engineering only).
Shall I check whether mobile working is planned for the position, or save the list as a task/reminder document in your workspace?
“For a week now, the print service on our print server has been crashing at night. Look at the log: what’s causing it, and what should we do?” Druckserver_PRN01_Ereignisse.log
File · Event log Real output
The log shows a clear chain of cause and effect:
Trigger: On 30 Sep 2026, 10:38 pm the printer driver "PX Universal PCL6" was updated from version 4.1.8.0 to 4.2.1.0 (affects HALLE2-LS01 and HALLE1-ETIKETT).
Consequence – every night since:
svc-erp) queues the nightly batch print "Lieferscheine_Sammeldruck" on HALLE2-LS01 (350–450 pages).This pattern (crash → service restart → deleted job) has occurred every night with a batch print since 1 Oct 2026 – 3 Oct and 4 Oct (weekend, no batch print job) are the only exceptions, which confirms the link with the large night job on HALLE2-LS01. Before the driver update (29/30 Sep), the same jobs ran without errors.
Cause: The updated PCL6 driver (4.2.1.0) is unstable when processing the large nightly batch print job on HALLE2-LS01 and makes the spooler crash.
pxupcl6.dll before updating again.Shall I save this as a document in your workspace or create a ticket template for IT/the service provider?
“Do the invoice, purchase order and delivery note match?” Invoice, purchase order, delivery note as PDF
File · 3 documents as PDF Real output
There are several discrepancies:
| Item | Purchase order 4500018237 | Delivery note LS-55120 | Invoice RE-26814 | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantity of GM-4 geared motors | 40 units | 38 units delivered (2 units back-ordered, follow-up delivery in week 42) | 40 units invoiced | 2 units overcharged |
| Price of GM-4 geared motor | EUR 186.50 (fixed price under annual agreement) | — | EUR 189.50 | EUR 3.00/unit too much |
| Freight/packaging | not provided for (delivery terms: free delivery) | — | EUR 95.00 extra | unjustified item |
| Payment terms | 14 days 2% discount / 30 days net | — | 14 days without deduction | early-payment discount missing |
Difference: EUR 588.00 net, EUR 699.72 gross overcharged
Reject invoice RE-26814 for correction or request a corrected invoice because of:
Payment should be withheld until this is clarified, or only the correct amount (EUR 9,042.81 gross) should be released.
“How are the cost centres doing against budget? Turn it into an overview with charts.” Kostenstellen_Jan-Sep_2026.xlsx
File · Cost centre report Real output
Cost centre controlling Jan–Sep 2026 is ready and saved in the workspace.
Key finding: Overall, the company is 2.6% under budget, with €2,475,000 actual against €2,540,000 plan. The only cost centre over budget: Marketing at +12.4% (€236,000 actual vs. €210,000 plan), driven mainly by an outlier in March (€45,100 instead of the planned €20,700).
Cost centre controlling Jan–Sep 2026HTML
Cost centre controllingPlan/actual comparison by cost centre
Jan–Sep 2026Total plan€2,540,000Jan–Sep 2026
Total actual€2,475,0006 cost centres
Variance−€65,000−2.6% · under budget
Over budget1 of 6Marketing: +12.4%
Plan vs. actual by cost centre (total Jan–Sep)
PlanActual (within budget)Actual (over budget)
| Cost centre | Plan | Actual | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sales (1000) | €450,000 | €412,000 | −€38,000 (−8.4%) |
| Marketing (2000) | €210,000 | €236,000 | +€26,000 (+12.4%) |
| IT (3000) | €340,000 | €318,000 | −€22,000 (−6.5%) |
| HR (4000) | €160,000 | €154,000 | −€6,000 (−3.8%) |
| Production (5000) | €1,260,000 | €1,238,000 | −€22,000 (−1.7%) |
| Purchasing (6000) | €120,000 | €117,000 | −€3,000 (−2.5%) |
Monthly trend (whole company)
PlanActual
| Month | Plan | Actual | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/2026 | €254,900 | €290,300 | +€35,400 |
| 02/2026 | €270,700 | €258,800 | −€11,900 |
| 03/2026 | €290,900 | €281,700 | −€9,200 |
| 04/2026 | €287,900 | €290,800 | +€2,900 |
| 05/2026 | €308,500 | €269,300 | −€39,200 |
| 06/2026 | €279,000 | €298,800 | +€19,800 |
| 07/2026 | €272,400 | €273,600 | +€1,200 |
| 08/2026 | €275,300 | €284,300 | +€9,000 |
| 09/2026 | €300,400 | €227,400 | −€73,000 |
Detail by cost centre
| Cost centre | Plan (EUR) | Actual (EUR) | Var. % | Status | Monthly trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales CC 1000 | €450,000 | €412,000 | −8.4% | Within budget | |
| Marketing CC 2000 | €210,000 | €236,000 | +12.4% | Over budget | |
| IT CC 3000 | €340,000 | €318,000 | −6.5% | Within budget | |
| HR CC 4000 | €160,000 | €154,000 | −3.8% | Within budget | |
| Production CC 5000 | €1,260,000 | €1,238,000 | −1.7% | Within budget | |
| Purchasing CC 6000 | €120,000 | €117,000 | −2.5% | Within budget |
Sparkline: actual bars per month, line = plan.
Assumptions & data
“Check this travel expense claim against our policy.” Travel_expenses_October.pdf Travel_expense_policy_2026.pdf
File · Claim and policy Real output
| Item | Amount | Review |
|---|---|---|
| Rail return trip, 1st class (journey time 1:17 h each way) | 2× €89.90 | Breach According to section 2 of the policy, 1st class is only allowed for journeys >4 h or if the price is not higher than 2nd class. The journey time is 1:17 h. A price comparison with 2nd class is missing. Without this proof, not reimbursable in full. |
| Hotel Am Maschsee, 2 nights at €118 incl. breakfast | €236.00 | OK Hanover is not one of the cities with the €170 cap (Munich/Frankfurt/Hamburg) but falls under the €140 cap. €118 is below it. |
| Hospitality, Muster Handel AG, 3 people (till receipt only) | €186.40 | Breach Section 6 of the policy requires a complete hospitality receipt: a machine-printed invoice plus the occasion and attendees, signed by the host. A till receipt alone is not enough – and the occasion and attendees are also missing. The receipt is incomplete; the item is currently not reimbursable. |
| Taxi hotel–customer–hotel | €31.80 | Borderline Section 5 of the policy requires that public transport was not reasonable, especially for customer appointments with presentation material. No reason is given here. Plausible for a customer appointment, but a short reason should be added. |
| Meal allowance | €44.80 | OK The calculation (2× €14 arrival/departure day + 1× €28 full day – 2× €5.60 breakfast deduction) matches section 7 of the policy exactly. |
| Deadline | – | OK Trip ended 3 Oct, submitted 5 Oct – well within the 4-week deadline (section 8). |
The claim is not reimbursable without corrections. Two points need to be clarified before it is approved:
The taxi receipt (€31.80) can go through with a short reason ("customer visit with presentation material"), but this should be added.
Shall I draft a query to Mr Meier, or save the claim with these comments as a document in the workspace?
“Compare these three quotes for packaging material.” 3 quotes as PDF
File · 3 quotes as PDF Real output
All three suppliers were asked on 22 Sep 2026; the quotes are dated 29 Sep 2026. They quote identical items (carton 400×300×200, carton 600×400×300, PP packing tape 50mm/66m), but with different prices, delivery terms and extra costs.
| Beispiel Karton GmbH (BK-26-0917) | Muster Pack AG (Q-88213) | Muster Verpackung GmbH & Co. KG (MV-2026-4471) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carton 400×300×200, 10,000 pcs | €0.79/pc → €7,900.00 | €850.00/1,000 → €8,500.00 | €0.82/pc → €8,200.00 |
| Carton 600×400×300, 5,000 pcs | €0.63/pc → €3,150.00 | €690.00/1,000 → €3,450.00 | €0.66/pc → €3,300.00 |
| Packing tape, 200 rolls | €4.50/roll → €900.00 | €5.75/roll → €1,150.00 | €4.90/roll → €980.00 |
| Net total | €11,950.00 | €13,100.00 | €12,480.00 |
| Freight/palletising | not included (€14.50/pallet + freight extra) | incl. (free to point of use) | incl. (free delivery, palletised) |
| Delivery time | 21 working days | 10 working days | 14 calendar days |
| Payment terms | 30 days net | 14 days net | 10 days 2% discount or 30 days net |
| Price validity | valid until 31 Oct 2026 | fixed until 31 Dec 2026 | binding for 30 days |
Conclusion: On net price alone, Beispiel Karton comes out ahead, but the missing freight/pallet costs put that into perspective. Taking delivery terms and the discount into account, Muster Verpackung is likely the most economical overall package. Muster Pack only wins if delivery time is critical.
Shall I save the comparison as a document in your workspace?
“Summarise this supplier’s message in English and draft a reply in German.” Email from Muster Components GmbH
File · Supplier email Real output
Sarah Collins from Muster Components (key account manager) is writing about order PO 4500018412 for 2,400 KS-12 control boards, so far confirmed for delivery on 20 October.
Decision needed: accept the partial delivery or wait for the complete delivery on 30 Oct.
Subject: AW: PO 4500018412 – geänderter Liefertermin für KS-12-Steuerplatinen
Hallo Sarah,
vielen Dank für Ihre frühzeitige Information zum MCU-Engpass und zu den Auswirkungen auf PO 4500018412.
Um Störungen in unserem Produktionsplan möglichst gering zu halten, nehmen wir Ihr Angebot einer Teillieferung gerne an: 1.000 Stück am 20. Oktober, die restlichen 1.400 Stück am 30. Oktober, ohne zusätzliche Frachtkosten.
Bitte bestätigen Sie diese Vereinbarung schriftlich und senden Sie uns eine aktualisierte Auftragsbestätigung mit beiden Lieferterminen.
Wir wären Ihnen außerdem dankbar, wenn Sie uns über weitere Entwicklungen bei der MCU-Versorgung auf dem Laufenden halten, die die zweite Teillieferung betreffen könnten.
Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis und Ihre Unterstützung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
[Name]
Einkauf, Kranich Antriebstechnik GmbH
Shall I adjust the draft (e.g. choose complete delivery instead of partial delivery), or use it as it is?
“Which framework agreements in the SharePoint folder Einkauf/Rahmenverträge expire in the next 90 days?”
Connector · SharePoint Real output
In the folder Einkauf/Rahmenverträge I checked the 6 framework agreements. Today: 7 Oct 2026 → 90-day window until 5 Jan 2027.
| Agreement | Contractor | End of term | Remaining | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building cleaning | Muster Facility Services GmbH | 31 Oct 2026 | ~24 days | Renews automatically for 12 months; the notice period (3 months before the end of term) would have ended on 31 Jul 2026 – this deadline has already passed, so the agreement will probably continue unless notice has already been given. |
| Printer maintenance | Beispiel Office Systems GmbH | 30 Nov 2026 | ~54 days | Ends automatically, no notice needed. An extension requires a new written agreement. |
| Courier service | Muster Express GmbH | 31 Dec 2026 | ~85 days | Renews automatically for 12 months unless terminated with 6 weeks’ notice – the notice period runs until approx. 19 Nov 2026, so action is still possible. |
Action needed: For the courier agreement, a decision on whether to terminate or let it run should be made before 19 Nov 2026. For building cleaning, it is worth checking whether notice was already given in time, since the actual notice period has already passed.
Every result is real output from a HUB.KI test environment, translated from German.
For municipal, state and federal authorities. The AI prepares; decisions and signatures stay with the authority.
Your industry isn’t listed? Talk to us – HUB.KI isn’t tied to any single sector.
40% of employees already use unauthorised, uncontrolled tools. Data leaves the company before you notice.
US servers, an unclear legal basis, no EU AI Act. Not an option for regulated industries.
Without governance, nobody knows who uses which AI and how. Violations only surface after the fact.
Without an official platform, employees fall back on their own unapproved tools. That leads to uncontrolled data leakage, GDPR violations and loss of control. A central platform delivers security, governance and real productivity.
Yes. EU hosting, zero retention, no model training on your data, fully auditable.
The current models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, Meta and DeepSeek. Intelligent routing picks the best model for each request automatically.
Productive AI in 90 days, in five phases: discovery workshop, technical setup, workshops for key users and the pilot group, personal support and a 12-month roadmap.
Connectors for Microsoft 365 (Outlook, Teams, SharePoint), Confluence, Jira, GitHub, HubSpot and Notion – usually a few clicks. We connect Google Workspace, Slack, SAP and others on request. An open REST API covers anything else. All integrations at a glance
It scales from mid-sized companies with 50 employees to corporations with thousands of users.